It was 680 years ago this week that a very significant battle was fought between the English and the Scottish on the outskirts of Durham, but it is often overlooked. Dr Alex Brown, from Durham University’s Department of History and Institute of Medieval and Early Modern Studies, says it really should be better known
One of the silver Scottish groats, thought to be from the Nevilles Cross hoard, which is to be auctioned in London later this month. The coin shows the likeness of King David II of Scotland who, ironically, was captured by the English at the Battle of Nevilles Cross after he was found hiding on the banks of the River Browney
ON October 17, 1346, the battle of Neville’s Cross was fought outside Durham. It was a decisive moment in Anglo-Scottish history that led to the capture of King David II of Scotland. Yet few have heard of it.
Other battles are far better known. Those of Stirling Bridge (1297), Falkirk (1298) and Bannockburn (1314) are more famous because of the exploits of William Wallace and Robert the Bruce. Similarly well-known are the successes of Edward III, the Black Prince and Henry V at Crécy (1346), Poitiers (1356) and Agincourt (1415), respectively.
Yet, less than two months after Crécy, a decisive victory was won in northern England. The battle of Neville’s Cross remains one of the least publicly known but decisive battles in English history.
An illuminated manuscript miniature,c.1430-1440, of Edward III of England.
As Edward III gathered a force of 15,000 men to invade France in 1346, King Philip VI of France requested Scottish aid. He wrote to King David in June and again in July: “I implore you to remember our friendship and our treaties and to strike as hard at England as you can.”
With Edward III and most of his nobles in France, Philip reassured David that England was a “defenceless void”. The opportunity was too good to miss.
David duly invaded England with a force of around 12,000 men on October 7. They stormed the Peel of Liddell (a motte-and-bailey castle on the Cumbrian border with Scotland), took a ransom from Carlisle and sacked Hexham Abbey, before resting outside Durham at Bearpark on October 16.
The English were not, however, caught unawares. Contrary to Philip’s assurances, Edward had not left his northern border undefended. A force of 6,000 men was raised by the northern lords, Henry Percy, of Alnwick, Ralph Neville, of Raby Castle, and the Archbishop of York.
Ruins of Beaurepaire medieval manor house and priory at Bearpark, near Durham
Seeking to catch the Scots unawares, they marched towards Bearpark before dawn on October 17. In the morning mists, the English force stumbled upon a Scottish raiding party led by William Douglas. Douglas hastily fled to inform King David that the English had successfully fielded an army against him.
The Anonimalle Chronicle, an anonymous 14th Century account written at St Mary’s Abbey in York, reported that David arose from his bed irritated and angrily said: “O man, that cannot be, because in England there are no men left but monks and canons, brothers and priests, swineherds and shepherds, cobblers and skinners; but all the knights are with their king overseas.”
The battle
TWO contemporary letters by the prior of Durham, John Fossor, and Thomas Sampson, a canon of York and Beverley, described how the English army arrived at the battlefield outside Durham at 9am. The two armies proceeded to stare at each other across the moor for the next five hours.
Then the English longbowmen opened fire on the Scots at 2pm, and the battle began in earnest. By 5pm, the Scots were routed and fled the field.
Although the ebb and flow of the battle is difficult to reconstruct, historians have suggested that “victory was achieved, not so much by archery, as by the hard work of fighting hand-to-hand in a fierce melee”.
The chronicle of Meaux Abbey, a Cistercian abbey near Beverley, which was written at the turn of the 15th Century, recorded that “because of their exhaustion and the length of the fight, they rested from the fight for a time, leaning on their spears and weapons”. The Anonimalle Chronicle similarly noted that the armies “rested by agreement and then fought again” on several occasions.
It is said that King David fled the battlefield and was found hiding underneath Aldin Grange Bridge, given away when English soldiers spotted his reflection in the water. This is a later rebuilding of the bridge
Local legend suggests that King David attempted to flee, hiding underneath Aldin Grange bridge. It is said he was captured because the English saw his reflection in the water of the River Browney. However, most contemporary chronicles record the king fighting courageously.
King David was wounded by two arrows. Despite this, the Scotichronicon, a 15th Century Scottish chronicle, reported that King David managed to knock out two of his captor’s teeth before being overwhelmed.
King David’s captor was a relatively humble Northumberland squire – John de Coupland. He was promoted to the rank of knight banneret, the highest position below the titled aristocracy. He also received a very large annuity of £500 per year (equivalent to just nearly £600,000 today, according to the Bank of England Inflation Calculator).
A largely fictional 15th Century depiction of the Battle of Neville’s Cross from the Chronicles of Froissart, which were compiled by Jean Froissart, a Belgian poet and historian, several decades afterwards
Devastating result
IT was a decisive and devastating result. The Scottish force lost up to 2,000 men, while the prior of Durham wrote that “few of us in the said battle were killed”.
Alongside King David, four Scottish earls and over a dozen major barons were captured. The Earl of Menteith, who had previously paid homage and sworn loyalty to Edward III, was hung, drawn and quartered for treason. The list of the dead included the earls of Moray and Strathearn, the marshal, constable, chancellor and chamberlain of Scotland, as well as many barons and knights.
In the following year, the English were able to occupy virtually of all of Scotland south of the Forth and Clyde rivers. It would take decades for the Scots to recover all they had lost. King David himself spent 11 years as an English prisoner before agreeing to pay a large ransom of 100,000 marks for his freedom (equivalent to £80m, according to the Inflation Calculator).
The Battle of Neville’s Cross was most significant because it stopped a series of potential might-have-beens.
A Scottish victory would have put pressure on Edward III to lift his siege of Calais and return to England. Instead, the resounding English victory secured Edward’s northern border for the rest of his long reign. This enabled him to raise 30,000 men for the Calais siege; the largest English force assembled during the hundred years war (1337-1453).
Why, then, is the battle not more famous?
Unlike Agincourt, it was not immortalised by Shakespeare. Unlike Bannockburn, national identities have not coalesced around it. The battle has not featured in a major cinematic portrayal. It has faded from popular memory in the long and bloody history of Anglo-Scottish warfare.
Although relatively few people today have heard of Neville’s Cross, the events of a few short hours there one October afternoon 680 years ago this week were of international significance. They came to shape the relations of England, Scotland and France for years to come.
The remnants of Neville's Cross. Picture: Google STreetView
JUST as the Battle of Neville’s Cross is often overlooked, so Neville’s Cross itself is one of Durham’s lesser known ancient treasures.
Today, a shadow of its former glory, its stump sits penned in behind metal railings at the top of Crossgate Peth, opposite St John’s Cross, and a quiet distance from the hubbub of the A167/A690 crossroads.
There was a cross here long before any battle. It may have been an Anglo-Saxon boundary marker, or a pilgrim’s cross as those approaching from the west would get their first glimpse of the cathedral from this high ground.
To commemorate the victory over the Scots, Ralph Neville, the 2nd Baron of Raby, erected a new cross here. He had led the English troops into battle and he helped establish his family as one of the most dominant forces in the north for generations to come.
He is buried in the south transept of the cathedral with his wife, Alice de Audley.
A drawing of Neville's Cross as it may have appeared in medieval times
Neville’s cross was probably about 25ft high, topped with carvings of Jesus on the cross on one side and St John the Evangelist on the other, with carvings of the four Evangelists – Matthew, Mark, Luke and John – a little further down.
However, following the dissolution, in 1589 it was knocked down and many of stones were carted off to make new buildings. In 1593, it was still described as having seven steps leading up to it, but those have also since been spirited away.
On the 5ft tall and very weathered remnants, Historic England says you can still make out two of the Evangelists. It says the socket stone is medieval, and you can still see two lewis holes in – the masons would have inserted an iron lewis into the holes to enable them to lift the heavy stone.
Recommended reading
King Cnut, a lost wooden cross and the story of a County Durham village
Cows, collapses and Churchill - the remarkable story of a pioneering Teesdale bridge
The County Durham village where a Roman bridge no longer crosses the River Tees
But much of the shaft is said to be an old milestone, repurposed from the nearby A167.
So how much of Neville’s Cross is original is very uncertain.
Once, though, it dominated the landscape, making the hearts of pilgrims leap and the Englishmen rejoice at their great victory. Now the way the ancient monument has been sidelined by the centuries would probably make Neville very cross indeed.