Badenoch claims Labour's spending plans based on future 'fictional cuts' that won't happen
According to extracts from her speech briefed overnight, Kemi Badenoch will argue later that John Healey needs to slash spending in the budget because UK government borrowing costs are too high. She will say:
Britain’s 30-year gilt yields are now above 6% - their highest level since 1998.
That means every pound we borrow is already costing us £2 in less than 12 years.
It is true the wars in Ukraine and Iran are pushing these rates up around the world.
But they are no more Labour’s fault than they were ours when the war in Ukraine started.
However, the UK is paying more to borrow than anyone else in the G7.
We are paying over a percent more than Greece and Spain.
We are paying nearly 2% more than Germany.
The whole argument on defence spending would go away if our interest rates reduced.
This is why we need to live within our means.
She will also argue that the spending reductions included in Labour’s plans for the final years of the decade are not credible.
They clearly don’t know the Labour party like we do.
Labour’s deficit reduction plans to meet their fiscal rules are predicated on making huge cuts to the public sector in the finalyear of the spending period.
I think there will be an election before then and they’ll never have to prove it.
Badenoch says Healey’s budget will be worse than Reeves’s if he doesn’t slash spending
Good morning. John Healey, the chancellor, is delivering his first budget a week tomorrow, and this morning there are two news developments that will help to frame the way it is received.
The most important is on the front page of the Times, where Steven Swinford has a story firming up that has already been hinted that: that Healey has decided not to raise capital gains tax in the budget. This is significant because a capital gains tax hike was for a while seen as the government’s preferred money-raising ploy, not least because several senior figures in the cabinet were lobbying for one earlier this year. But now it is off the table, according to Swinford. He says:
Senior allies of Andy Burnham, including several cabinet ministers, have been pressing for a rise in capital gains tax on the sale of second homes, shares and other assets to help repair the public finances.
However, the chancellor has ruled this out after warnings that it could ultimately cost the government money if wealthy individuals left the UK or deferred selling assets …
It means that the biggest “revenue raiser” in the budget will be a tax raid on banks, which will be used to help fund a targeted and temporary package of support on the cost of living. Healey will also reduce the government’s fiscal headroom — a buffer against future events — from £23bn to around £15bn.
There is a Whitehall myth about how the Treasury never gives out detail about what’s coming in the budget before it is actually announced. In fact, on certain issues, the Treasury regularly ensures that the media gets an accurate picture of what is coming in a budget to minimise the risk of the markets getting an unwelcome surprise. This is done not through on-the-record statements, but via murky background nods, winks and hints. That has been happening overnight, with journalists being assured that the Times’ story is accurate.
The second intervention is coming from Kemi Badenoch, the Conservative leader. In a speech this morning, she will claim that Healey’s budget will be even worse than the two delivered by Rachel Reeves, which raised taxes by £40bn and £26bn respectively. That is because Healey is not cutting spending, Badenoch will say. She will argue:
John Healey is not Rachel Reeves.
Many people see that as an improvement.
How could it be worse than £70bn in new tax rises across just two budgets?
However, I’m worried that next week John Healey will deliver a budget that does more damage to our country than either of Rachel Reeves’ budgets did.
We are being told that next week’s budget is going to be “nothing to see here”.
That is code in Whitehall for a budget that tries to do aslittle as possible … in the hope that no one notices.
Picture the chancellor burying his head in the sand and hoping to deliver a budget so inconsequential that it “does no harm” - as some Labour MPs have been asking.
But the problem is that Britain cannot afford to do as little as possible.
Problems have caught up with us that we can no longer afford to run away from.
First and foremost, that means living within our means.
10am: Kemi Badenoch gives a speech and holds a press conference.
11.30am: Yvette Cooper, the health secretary, takes questions in the Commons.
Noon: Heather Hallett publishes the latest report from the Covid inquiry, covering care homes.
Noon: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.
After 12.30pm: MPs resume their debate on the Northern Ireland Troubles bill.
2pm:Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, speaks at a rally in Plymouth.
2.30pm: Jonathan Reynolds, the business secretary, gives evidence to the Commons business committee.
I’m afraid we are no longer able to have comments open below the line every day on this blog. If you want to contact me, please email politics.live@theguardian.com. You can use this email to flag up corrections, comments for publication, questions or complaints.